Peter Bruegel is known for depicting the common masses of humanity, focusing on rural working scenes, religion, superstition, and the socio-political intrigues of his time. Allegedly, he was born into a family of peasants. He tackled these themes with droll, often grotesque humor.
Bruegel is sometimes referred to as the Second Bosch due to the influence Bosch had on him. Both are known for their detailed, fantastical, and often grotesque depictions of human folly, moral lessons, and religious themes.
đĄ His distinctive contribution to art history lies in his narrative compositions, where sprawling landscapes are filled with numerous figures engaged in daily activities, focusing on the absurdity and vices of humanity.
Bruegel also pioneered the depiction of everyday working life, captured with honesty and empathy, which was rather uncommon during the Renaissance, a time that mostly focused on heroic figures and nobility.
Bruegel created many grotesque creatures after Bosch, by recombining elements of humans, vegetables, animals, and inanimate objects. Like many artists of his time, his inspiration came from local legends, the socio-political context, proverbs, and other artists.
Without knowledge of the proverbs of that time, it is often difficult to interpret his works. Itâs also worth noting that during this period, people were highly superstitious and easily deceived, which became a frequent subject of humor depicted visually.
He was a sketch artist, and all of his sketches were produced as engravings by Peter Van der Heyden.
It's interesting how little interest Bruegel showed in individual humans. He painted neither portraits nor nudity, which were so common during the Renaissance (15th-17th century). While Italian painters aimed for perfection in the human form, portraying it as sublime and distinctly superior to the animal worldâbelieving humans were created in the image of God.
Bruegel's scenes often teem with numerous, indistinguishable figures, many appearing foolish and devoid of emotion. Rather than romanticizing or idealizing humanity, he emphasized its animalistic and flawed nature. Later, Bruegel shifted his focus to nature, making it the centerpiece of works like his series depicting the months of the year, where he used color to convey mood and atmosphere.
Touching upon the same theme as The Beekeepers, Big Fish Eat Little Fish alludes to the food chain and is proverbial, like many works of that time. We literally witness the powerful swallowing the weak in our world.
In this work, Bruegel explores the complicity of human natureâthere is always someone after another. Here, the man climbing the tree is seen as a nest robber. The beekeepers ârobâ bees of their honey, just as the bees extract nectar from flowers. In turn, Bruegel, as an artist, âstealsâ from nature. Itâs a chain of predators and victims. The beekeepers, who hide their faces, suggest the desire to keep their actions private, even on a sunny day.
This drawing is a satire on human ignorance and folly. Although the painting is outside the frame, we can assume itâs of high value, as the merchant immediately reaches for his money bag. The work critiques the desire to possess without truly understanding what is possessed.
The merchantâs glasses imply his shortsightednessâboth mental and physicalâemphasizing that he and the painter do not share the same artistic vision.
This painting supposedly depicts more than 200 children engaged in various games of the time. Childhood was not seen as a separate phase of life, but rather as a preliminary stage to adulthood. Children were treated as little adults, which is reflected in their clothingâsimilar to that of grown-ups. Moreover, they had few toys and mostly played with whatever they could find. There was little emotional affection compared to today, due to the large number of children being born into families, with many dying early. As a result, parents often did not form deep emotional attachments. The children in the painting appear rather ageless and expressionless, which contrasts with the way children would be depicted in later centuries.
We see two monkeys looking out the window of what looks like a prison. In the distance, we see the city of Antwerp. The monkeyâs feet are chained and around them thereâs nutshells scattered. The nutshells likely refer to the Netherlandish proverb - to go to a court for the sake of a hazelnut, which means risk oneâs freedom for something unimportant. Furthermore, in Christian iconography the monkeys are mostly associated with miserliness and stupidity.
This painting is fascinating, itâs a visual representation of more than a 100 of the Netherlandish proverbs of Bruegelâs time. Oftentimes, when we confusedly look at a painting and attribute its depictions to the artist's hallucinations, it is actually a narrative based on proverbs.
Hereâs the analysis of some of the proverbs:
And so onâŚ
Dulle Griet (or Dull Gret, in its anglicized form) is a figure from Flemish folklore. She led a group of peasant women, clad in armor, into battle against the forces of Hell. In Bruegel's depiction, she strides unshakably and bluntly through chaos, undeterred by the gruesome creatures, heading toward the mouth of Hell. Dulle Griet represents a nearly absurd level of bravery, often symbolizing the rebellious spirit of common people, particularly women, against societal constraints and oppression.
Peter Bruegel is known for depicting the common masses of humanity, focusing on rural working scenes, religion, superstition, and the socio-political intrigues of his time. Allegedly, he was born into a family of peasants. He tackled these themes with droll, often grotesque humor.
Bruegel is sometimes referred to as the Second Bosch due to the influence Bosch had on him. Both are known for their detailed, fantastical, and often grotesque depictions of human folly, moral lessons, and religious themes.
đĄ His distinctive contribution to art history lies in his narrative compositions, where sprawling landscapes are filled with numerous figures engaged in daily activities, focusing on the absurdity and vices of humanity.
Bruegel also pioneered the depiction of everyday working life, captured with honesty and empathy, which was rather uncommon during the Renaissance, a time that mostly focused on heroic figures and nobility.
Bruegel created many grotesque creatures after Bosch, by recombining elements of humans, vegetables, animals, and inanimate objects. Like many artists of his time, his inspiration came from local legends, the socio-political context, proverbs, and other artists.
Without knowledge of the proverbs of that time, it is often difficult to interpret his works. Itâs also worth noting that during this period, people were highly superstitious and easily deceived, which became a frequent subject of humor depicted visually.
He was a sketch artist, and all of his sketches were produced as engravings by Peter Van der Heyden.
It's interesting how little interest Bruegel showed in individual humans. He painted neither portraits nor nudity, which were so common during the Renaissance (15th-17th century). While Italian painters aimed for perfection in the human form, portraying it as sublime and distinctly superior to the animal worldâbelieving humans were created in the image of God.
Bruegel's scenes often teem with numerous, indistinguishable figures, many appearing foolish and devoid of emotion. Rather than romanticizing or idealizing humanity, he emphasized its animalistic and flawed nature. Later, Bruegel shifted his focus to nature, making it the centerpiece of works like his series depicting the months of the year, where he used color to convey mood and atmosphere.
Touching upon the same theme as The Beekeepers, Big Fish Eat Little Fish alludes to the food chain and is proverbial, like many works of that time. We literally witness the powerful swallowing the weak in our world.
In this work, Bruegel explores the complicity of human natureâthere is always someone after another. Here, the man climbing the tree is seen as a nest robber. The beekeepers ârobâ bees of their honey, just as the bees extract nectar from flowers. In turn, Bruegel, as an artist, âstealsâ from nature. Itâs a chain of predators and victims. The beekeepers, who hide their faces, suggest the desire to keep their actions private, even on a sunny day.
This drawing is a satire on human ignorance and folly. Although the painting is outside the frame, we can assume itâs of high value, as the merchant immediately reaches for his money bag. The work critiques the desire to possess without truly understanding what is possessed.
The merchantâs glasses imply his shortsightednessâboth mental and physicalâemphasizing that he and the painter do not share the same artistic vision.
This painting supposedly depicts more than 200 children engaged in various games of the time. Childhood was not seen as a separate phase of life, but rather as a preliminary stage to adulthood. Children were treated as little adults, which is reflected in their clothingâsimilar to that of grown-ups. Moreover, they had few toys and mostly played with whatever they could find. There was little emotional affection compared to today, due to the large number of children being born into families, with many dying early. As a result, parents often did not form deep emotional attachments. The children in the painting appear rather ageless and expressionless, which contrasts with the way children would be depicted in later centuries.
We see two monkeys looking out the window of what looks like a prison. In the distance, we see the city of Antwerp. The monkeyâs feet are chained and around them thereâs nutshells scattered. The nutshells likely refer to the Netherlandish proverb - to go to a court for the sake of a hazelnut, which means risk oneâs freedom for something unimportant. Furthermore, in Christian iconography the monkeys are mostly associated with miserliness and stupidity.
This painting is fascinating, itâs a visual representation of more than a 100 of the Netherlandish proverbs of Bruegelâs time. Oftentimes, when we confusedly look at a painting and attribute its depictions to the artist's hallucinations, it is actually a narrative based on proverbs.
Hereâs the analysis of some of the proverbs:
And so onâŚ
Dulle Griet (or Dull Gret, in its anglicized form) is a figure from Flemish folklore. She led a group of peasant women, clad in armor, into battle against the forces of Hell. In Bruegel's depiction, she strides unshakably and bluntly through chaos, undeterred by the gruesome creatures, heading toward the mouth of Hell. Dulle Griet represents a nearly absurd level of bravery, often symbolizing the rebellious spirit of common people, particularly women, against societal constraints and oppression.